I've always been confused about the overall logical argument regarding QED. If the idea is that the agreement between the mathematical model and the observation is important, there is a much simpler way: https://eletron-muon-and-proton-magnetic-moments.tiiny.site/
The interesting thing, I think anyway, is that the very simple model doesn't take calculus, while the standard model couldn't even really be written down by human beings, the details are only ever contained in the guts of a supercomputer.
so glad to see a student so young trying to comprehend these difficult concepts. your articles look amazing. Will try to find some time to read them in detail. You've got a new sub. I've even recommended yours on my profile.
You can subscribe to Bohring too. It keeps me going.
Just my nowadays outsider opinion. You might get a nice head start on your colleagues and critics if you were to reconsider ether physics. I read from Paul Laviolette that the famous Michelson Morley experiment allegedly disproving ether and supporting Einstein, was a failure due to design flaws. Subsequently, the experiment was redesigned and re-run successfully predicting such things as speed of earth around sun, around galaxy, and toward Virgo, along with usable estimates of ether drag. Following this, the experiment was quickly replicated more than 60 times in different labs world-wide, with the same results. Rumor has it that this ether theory, along with corrections to Einstein's ideas about an equivalence of momentum and gravity, are the foundations of modern electrogravitics such are used in the B-2 and other more exotic flying devices.
Paul LaViolette, The Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, Ch.4, An Aetheric Explanation; Ch.9, Unconventional Flying Objects; Ch. 11 Electrogravitic Wave Experiments.
..., Genesis of the Cosmos, Ch.12, Ether or Vacuum (The Michelson Morley Experiments).
I've always been confused about the overall logical argument regarding QED. If the idea is that the agreement between the mathematical model and the observation is important, there is a much simpler way: https://eletron-muon-and-proton-magnetic-moments.tiiny.site/
The interesting thing, I think anyway, is that the very simple model doesn't take calculus, while the standard model couldn't even really be written down by human beings, the details are only ever contained in the guts of a supercomputer.
Interesting
I like how you view quantum electromagnetism I'm currently researching on quantum mechanics alittle more.
You see research and you think I'm some kind of PhD or so , I'm actually 13 , and I have been obsessed with astrophysics and math since day one.
Would love to connect, check out my pieces aswell .
so glad to see a student so young trying to comprehend these difficult concepts. your articles look amazing. Will try to find some time to read them in detail. You've got a new sub. I've even recommended yours on my profile.
You can subscribe to Bohring too. It keeps me going.
And hey , do you mind……recommending me ?? Not pressuring just I would appreciate it I have been stuck at 145 for 4 days
Absolutely, and YOU can also tell your 1.1k to subscribe here . I would rlly appreciate it like you have a larger community than me.
Thanks , just subbed
Just my nowadays outsider opinion. You might get a nice head start on your colleagues and critics if you were to reconsider ether physics. I read from Paul Laviolette that the famous Michelson Morley experiment allegedly disproving ether and supporting Einstein, was a failure due to design flaws. Subsequently, the experiment was redesigned and re-run successfully predicting such things as speed of earth around sun, around galaxy, and toward Virgo, along with usable estimates of ether drag. Following this, the experiment was quickly replicated more than 60 times in different labs world-wide, with the same results. Rumor has it that this ether theory, along with corrections to Einstein's ideas about an equivalence of momentum and gravity, are the foundations of modern electrogravitics such are used in the B-2 and other more exotic flying devices.
Paul LaViolette, The Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, Ch.4, An Aetheric Explanation; Ch.9, Unconventional Flying Objects; Ch. 11 Electrogravitic Wave Experiments.
..., Genesis of the Cosmos, Ch.12, Ether or Vacuum (The Michelson Morley Experiments).
hmm... interesting.